Connect with us


AEC implementation heavily depends on Indonesia

The success for capital markets under the Asean Economic Community (AEC) will be heavily dependent on populous Indonesia being ready to participate in an ambitious integration



The success for capital markets under the Asean Economic Community (AEC) will be heavily dependent on populous Indonesia being ready to participate in an ambitious integration that envisions a single market and production base in the region.

The arrival of the AEC on Dec 31, 2015, in theory, should simplify trade and investment between member nations, and help make it a major global economic player. But the readiness of Indonesia to embrace AEC, especially in the area of capital market integration, has been a question.

Making up roughly 40% of the region’s US$2.1 trillion economy, Indonesia is by far the biggest and most impactful player in the 10-member AEC. Its reluctance to open up the economy further has drawn concerns on the success of the AEC.

In terms of the Asean Capital Markets Forum (ACMF) under the AEC, a critical component is for the development of a deep, liquid and integrated capital market, to enable freer flow of capital across the region.

This will also raise the profile of Asean as an asset class and attract greater international investment into the region.

So far, only three countries – Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia – have joined the trading link.

The overall objective of this link is to provide investors in Asean an easier and seamless access into the region’s markets from one single access point. Indonesia is not part of the link yet.

CIMB group chairman Datuk Seri Nazir Razak said that in his opinion, Asean was nothing without Indonesia – the largest economy.

“The world acknowledges the importance of Indonesia by its inclusion in G20. Every Asean initiative must include Indonesia, or at least have a timeline for Indonesia’s inclusion. And therein lies one of my major concerns for AEC.

“Economic nationalism in Indonesia is on the rise, partly because of fears about AEC, and if the new Joko Widodo administration chooses to pander to this sentiment, then I would turn bearish about AEC’s prospects,” said Nazir.

The banker, who wants to see the group become a truly Asean financial group, said that Indonesia’s reluctance was telling considering that the country was not part of the Asean trading link.

“It does provide an alternative means for investors to trade across exchanges. But this is already available through regional brokers and inter-broker transactions.

“There is a need to understand Indonesia’s reluctance, what it means on the broader level in terms of its real commitment to AEC and what can be done about it,” said Nazir.

In general, Indonesia still has reservations on the market-integration plan, mainly because its infrastructure is not up to mark with the rest of the region.

In Indonesia, one of the main problems is that the law does not accommodate foreign firms from entering its bourse for a listing.

Right now, foreign companies are not able to list on the Indonesian Stock Exchange because there is no supporting regulation and thus, cross-border offerings are not allowed.

As this involves a law, it becomes a political matter, and hence will take time to change and enact.

A clear development of Indonesia not participating in the AEC is when it opted out of the Asia Region Funds Passport (ARFP) initiative last August.

This is an initiative under the Asean Collective Investment Scheme (CIS) framework which allows fund managers operating in a member jurisdiction to offer CIS constituted and authorised in that jurisdiction to retail investors in other member jurisdictions under a streamlined authorisation process.

Six countries – Australia, South Korea, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand – have committed themselves to the implementation of broader cross-border offering of CIS under ARFP.

Indonesia has opted out because of the lack of domestic infrastructure and the relative inadequacy of its funds industry.

These factors have also added to the authorities’ inability to regulate.

“While the necessary trading infrastructure is already in place, the next challenge is attracting greater transaction volume and scale that would also enhance the attractiveness of this proposition to other Asean member countries,” said Securities Commission (SC) chairman Datuk Ranjit Ajit Singh.

Ranjit said for the Asean investment value proposition to be realised, it was imperative for all member countries to be on board, with the participation of major regional markets being a particularly crucial success factor.

“At the same time, we also recognise the different stages of market development within the region and how policymakers must strike the right balance among important domestic priorities before they are ready to provide stronger commitment at the regional level,” he said.

Recognising the challenges posed by this balancing act, Ranjit said the ACMF had worked and would continue to work with individual member countries on specific areas, particularly capacity-building, to assist in the implementation of the necessary preconditions for regional market integration.

As of Sept 2014, the SC has taken over as the chair of the ACMF.


The post Asean Economic Community implementation heavily dependent on Indonesia appeared first on Asean Investment | Marc Djandji Blog.

Indonesia Today

Indonesia’s economic growth in 2014 is projected by the World Bank to be 5.2 percent, slightly lower than the 5.3 percent forecasted in the March 2014 IEQ. Lower government consumption than previously expected, slower credit growth and continued weakness in commodity-related income growth are likely to constrain GDP growth in the second half of 2014.

To achieve longer term goals such as lifting growth above 6 percent and reducing inequality, deeper structural reforms such as fuel subsidy reform and more infrastructure investment are crucial and would help share more broadly prosperity. In the absence of policy measures to support investment and productivity growth, the risks of a more structural deterioration in growth will mount.


The Indonesia-Singapore Bilateral Investment Treaty Comes into Effect

Through the upgraded DTAA, the tax rate on branch profits was reduced from 15 to 10 percent, and the tax rate on royalties for copyrighted works of literature, arts, and film, and eight percent for the use of industrial, scientific, or commercial equipment was lowered from 15 to 10 percent.



The Indonesia-Singapore Bilateral Investment Treaty Comes into Effect

The latest Indonesia-Singapore Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) came into effect on March 9, 2021, and replaces the previous BIT, which was signed in June 2006 and expired in June 2016.

Continue Reading


Will South-east Asia’s tech giants turn to SPACs to boost post-pandemic growth?



Will South-east Asia’s tech giants turn to SPACs to boost post-pandemic growth?

– SPACs have become a hot-button topic in global finance
– The vehicle is widely used to help tech start-ups go public
– Both Singapore’s and Indonesia’s exchanges are set to allow SPACs
– Several South-east Asian tech unicorns may use SPACs to list publicly

South-east Asia is seeing a wave of interest in special purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs, with various major tech players considering them as a means to fast-track public listings. In parallel to this, several exchanges in the region are moving to allow SPAC listings, with a view to boosting post-coronavirus growth.

SPACs are shell companies set up by investors and then listed on a given stock exchange. Their sole function is to acquire a private company, enabling it to go public without having to go through a traditional initial public offering (IPO).

A SPAC does nothing beyond its essential function – it neither produces nor sells anything, and a SPAC’s only assets are the funds raised from its own IPO.

Crucially, people who buy into a SPAC do not know what its eventual acquisition target or targets will be. This is why SPACs are often referred to as “blank cheque companies”: they give the founders a free rein to back their choice of private company. A key feature of SPACs is that they are often headed by big-name business executives or fund managers, who trade on past successes to inspire trust in investors.

While they are far from a novel phenomenon, SPACs have become a hot button topic in recent times: SPAC initial offerings quadrupled last year, with the vehicles raising a record $80bn.

Merging with a SPAC enables a company to go public and raise capital more quickly and painlessly than with a traditional IPO, circumventing some of the volatility that Covid-19 unleashed on global markets. At the same time, they function rather like venture capital, helping investors to buy into high-growth start-ups on the ground floor.

Read More

Continue Reading

Most Viewed

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 14,160 other subscribers