# The real driving force behind development isn’t money, it’s trust

- Link: https://www.thailand-business-news.com/business/327267-the-real-driving-force-behind-development-isnt-money-its-trust
- Published: 2026-09-08T15:33:32+07:00
- Author: J. Allan

Private capital often avoids infrastructure and development projects in Asia and
the Pacific not because of poor project quality but due to weak financial reporting
and auditing systems. Drawing on an Asian Development Bank essay, the piece argues
that investors require trustworthy financial data to assess risk, and without reliable
accounting standards and independent audits, they demand higher returns or avoid
investment entirely.

Weak financial trust causes banks to lend against physical collateral rather than
business performance, excluding smaller viable firms. This creates a gap between
countries adopting international accounting standards legally and implementing them
meaningfully. The piece concludes that credible financial reporting serves broader
public functions beyond attracting investment, including tax collection and government
accountability, and that such trust must be earned gradually rather than legislated.

ADVERTISEMENT

Every development strategist in Asia and the Pacific knows the arithmetic. Public
budgets cannot cover the region’s infrastructure and social needs, so private capital
must fill the gap. 

What gets less attention is why that capital so often stays on the sidelines even
when the need is obvious, and the projects are sound.

A recent [essay](https://blogs.adb.org/blog/how-trust-financial-reporting-helps-drive-development)
from the Asian Development Bank, written by financial management officer Deewas 
Khadka, makes the case plainly. Investors do not fund a project because it is important.
They fund it because they trust the numbers behind it. 

When that trust is absent, even a technically excellent power plant, road or water
system can struggle to find backers.

### Why the “boring” part of finance matters most

Before capital moves, three conditions usually need to be satisfied: a project must
be bankable, its risks must be identifiable, and the environment around it must 
be dependable. 

It is the third condition that gets waved through as a formality, and it is the 
one Khadka argues deserves the closest scrutiny. 

Reliable financial reporting and independent audits are what allow investors to 
believe that the people managing a project can account for its resources and report
results honestly.

### Related**Posts**

###  󠀁[What sector-specific licenses are required for foreign investors in Indonesia?](https://www.thailand-business-news.com/asean/334904-what-sector-specific-licenses-are-required-for-foreign-investors-in-indonesia)󠁿

###  󠀁[Oil Prices Surge on Saudi Attacks, Raising Risks for Thailand’s Recovery](https://www.thailand-business-news.com/business/335915-oil-prices-surge-on-saudi-attacks-raising-risks-for-thailands-recovery)󠁿

###  󠀁[Thailand Business News — Wednesday, 21 October 2026 | Thailand, ASEAN & Global Markets](https://www.thailand-business-news.com/business/335618-thailand-business-news-wednesday-21-october-2026-thailand-asean-global-markets)󠁿

###  󠀁[Asian foreign exchange markets remain under pressure as rising US yields weigh on regional currencies](https://www.thailand-business-news.com/currencies/334606-asian-foreign-exchange-markets-remain-under-pressure-as-rising-us-yields-weigh-on-regional-currencies)󠁿

This is easy to dismiss as a back-office concern. It is not. Accounting standards
define what must be disclosed. 

Audits test whether that disclosure can be believed. Strip either one out, and investors
are left pricing uncertainty instead of risk, which almost always means demanding
higher returns or simply walking away.

### The hidden cost of weak financial trust

The clearest evidence of this problem shows up in ordinary lending behavior. In 
many developing markets, banks still lend against land and buildings rather than
against a company’s actual financial performance, because collateral feels safer
than a balance sheet. 

That habit quietly excludes smaller businesses that lack property to pledge but 
have viable, revenue-generating operations. 

These are often the firms most responsible for local employment and innovation, 
and they are also the ones locked out by a system that does not trust financial 
statements enough to lend against them.

The gap between law and practice compounds the problem. Many countries have adopted
international accounting standards in legislation. 

Far fewer have made those standards work in practice. Audits in some markets have
become a compliance ritual rather than genuine independent scrutiny, and financial
statements fall short of what they claim to represent. 

Reform on paper does not automatically produce trust in the field, and businesses
that need financing the most often see the least benefit from it.

### Five fixes worth taking seriously

Khadka’s essay outlines a practical agenda for governments willing to treat this
as a priority rather than a technicality:

Reporting obligations should scale with risk, so large companies and banks face 
full requirements while smaller firms face proportionate ones, preserving scrutiny
without burying small business in paperwork.

Financial information should be genuinely accessible. A report filed away and never
seen again helps no one. Central filing systems and digital, open reporting make
information usable by lenders, regulators and tax authorities alike.

The accounting and auditing profession should be funded and staffed like infrastructure,
because universities, professional qualifications and continuing education are what
make standards function rather than merely exist on paper.

Reform needs a clear owner. Too many countries support better reporting in principle
while responsibility for delivering it is scattered across agencies with no single
body accountable for results.

And countries should diagnose their own weaknesses honestly, using tools such as
the World Bank’s Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes to identify where
trust is strong and where it is not, then build a plan with real deadlines and accountability
behind it.

### A public good, not just an investor courtesy

The value of credible financial reporting extends well beyond any single deal. Reliable
accounting records help tax authorities collect revenue they are owed. 

They give journalists, lawmakers and citizens the ability to follow public money.
They give regulators the evidence they need to catch abuse before it spreads. 

A country that neglects its reporting and audit systems is not only less attractive
to foreign capital. It is also weakening the domestic institutions that accountability
depends on.

### Trust cannot be legislated, only earned

The uncomfortable conclusion is that none of this can be manufactured by decree.
Trust is built slowly, through years of consistent reporting and institutions that
behave the way they claim to. There is no ribbon cutting for a more rigorous audit
regime, which is precisely why governments tend to underinvest in it.

But the logic Khadka lays out is hard to argue with. Development needs will keep
growing faster than public budgets. 

Private capital will not arrive simply because a project deserves it. It arrives
when risk can be measured, and institutions can be believed. 

For governments across the region serious about closing their financing gap, credible
financial reporting is not a technical afterthought to development strategy. It 
is the foundation the rest of the strategy stands on.
