Connect with us


Thailand’s rice scheme could spark food crisis

A new paddy-pledging programme in Thailand that has already pushed up the cost of rice globally will go into effect on October, amid uncertainty and scepticism.

Boris Sullivan



A new paddy-pledging programme in Thailand that has already pushed up the cost of rice globally will go into effect on 7 October, amid uncertainty and scepticism. The move by the world’s leading exporter has stirred humanitarian concerns far beyond Thailand’s borders, particularly for rice-consuming countries that do not produce much at home.

The government plans to pay its farmers more than double the market value for rice. “We have been very concerned about this, mostly because this is going to affect [African] markets – definitely,” said Aliou Diagne, an economist with the Benin-based Africa Rice Center. USAID last month warned that prices were likely to climb 20 percent over the next three months, while others predict the greatest short-term impact has already been felt.


Rice exports

Photo: FAO

What happens next, economists say, depends on how Thailand implements the programme. In the long term, analysts said they expect it to encourage other countries to step up exports and thus dampen the price of rice – consumed by three billion people daily.

But some say what Thailand is doing is unsustainable, and doubt it will last long.

“This is going to be detrimental to the rice sector in Thailand, especially in the long term,”

said Concepción Calpe, a senior economist with the UN Food and Agriculture Organization FAO in Rome.

“They’re pricing themselves in a manner that doesn’t make them competitive.”

Measuring the impact

Under the plan – a campaign pledge by recently appointed Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra – the government is raising the minimum guaranteed price for farmers by more than 60 percent, to 15,000 baht, or US$480, per ton.

The policy is aimed at supporting farmers and boosting Thailand’s agriculture sector, government spokeswoman Anuttama Amornvivat said.

“If the farmers have more income, they will spend more money in the economy,” she said. “When we spend more, the GDP will definitely increase – significantly.”

But it has drawn criticism over whether it is an effective policy for Thailand and the best way to help farmers. Because payments are linked to production, the bigger farmers stand to gain most, Samarendu Mohanty of the International Rice Research Institute in the Philippines, said.

Subsistence farmers may even be hurt by the scheme, as it could push up input costs. The best way for governments to support smaller farmers was through programmes that did not link payment to production, said Mohanty, who researches rice policy and trade as head of IRRI’s social sciences division.

“That way you are not distorting the market, domestic or global,” he said, “and you still support the farmer.”

If there is a surplus

The higher price would likely lead to a surplus, as Thai farmers produce more and Thai people buy less, said Mohanty. “The impact on the global market depends on what they [Thai officials] do with this surplus.”

Thailand has two options: it can aggressively sell the surplus rice in foreign markets – at a loss. This would cost Thai taxpayers billions of dollars, he said, and likely drive global rice prices below what they would have been without the pledging scheme.

“Then basically the Thai government has decided to subsidize the rest of the world,” said David Dawe, a senior economist at the FAO in Bangkok. “Everybody’s happy except for the Thai taxpayer.”

Alternatively, Thailand can export the amount of surplus rice at a price to cover its costs, implementing cost-control measures and storing the remaining rice. This could lead to higher prices worldwide, Mohanty said. But they would not last long, because other countries would increase their rice exports in response, which could be good for long-term food security.

“On the bright side, this process could provide an opportunity for countries with abundant land and water, such as Cambodia, Myanmar and Brazil, to emerge as alternate suppliers to the global rice market,”

Mohanty wrote in a recent IRRI article.

Food security questions

Global rice prices have risen by about 20 percent since May. The recent lifting of a government ban on rice exports in India, which frees up two million tons of rice for international trade, has helped temper the impact. But there is speculation that rice is being hoarded in anticipation of higher profits.

The countries most vulnerable to price increases are those that rely on imports and have limited local production: coastal countries in West Africa, Central America, Djibouti, Somalia and Haiti, according to USAID.

In response to the 2008 global food crisis, African countries have been investing in local rice production, measures that guard against outside volatility, Diagne said. Rice production has grown 9 percent each year across Africa.

But many countries still depend heavily on imports, with as much as 80 percent of rice consumed from foreign markets. “So any fluctuation in prices is felt right away,” Diagne said.

In Somalia, the new Thai rice policy is one of several factors expected to increase the number of people in crisis in 2012, said Tamara Nanitashvili, a food security technical manager at FAO Somalia. More than half the country depends on rice as a main food staple. Rice prices also act as a ceiling for cereals such as maize and sorghum.

In addition, rice comprised 9 percent of the World Food Programme’s 2010 food purchases, spokesman Marcus Prior said. Volatile food prices are a big challenge, he said, but forward-purchasing acts as a protective measure.

via IRIN Global | GLOBAL: Thai rice policy sows worldwide uncertainty


 Key facts about rice

• Rice is the staple food for more than half the world’s population, including 640 million undernourished people living in Asia.

• For every one billion people added to the world’s population, an additional 100 million MT of rice needs to be produced every year.

• Rice is uniquely suited to wet environments in which other crops would not survive; hence its widespread popularity across Asia.

• Projected demand for rice will outstrip supply in the near to medium term unless something is done to reverse current trends.

• Rice consumption exceeds 100kg per person per year in many Asian countries.

• One-fifth of the world’s population, more than one billion people, depend on rice cultivation for their livelihood.

• Asia, where about 90 percent of all rice is grown, has more than 200 million rice farms, most of which smaller than one hectare.

• Rice is the fastest-growing food staple in Africa and one of the most important and fastest growing staples in Latin America – both regions are net importers.

• In most of the developing world, rice availability is equated with food security and closely connected to political stability.

• The top five producers are: China, India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Vietnam.

• The top five exporters are: Thailand, Vietnam, Pakistan, US and India.

• The top five importers are: Philippines, Iran, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and Iraq.

• Some 120,000 varieties of rice exist today.

• Worldwide, 80 million hectares of irrigated rice (55 percent of the total area) produce about three-quarters of rice harvested.

• Average global rice yields are around four tonnes per hectare, but yields of more than 10 tonnes a hectare have been recorded.

• It takes between 90 and 200 days for a rice crop to mature.

Source: IRRI, USDA



Thai fruit exports to FTA markets up 107 percent

China, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines, Hong Kong, Australia and Chile are top importers of Thai fruits, especially fresh durian, mangosteen, longan and mango. Thai exporters are able to benefit from FTA privileges.

National News Bureau of Thailand



BANGKOK (NNT) – Thailand’s fruit exports continue to increase, despite the sluggish global economy caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, with key trade partners being countries that have free trade agreements (FTAs) with the kingdom.


Continue Reading


The Future of Asia: greener but with a public and private debt hangover

The COVID-19 pandemic has been a perfect storm, destroying jobs, worsening poverty and inequality, and creating a public and private debt problem—especially for countries and firms already in fragile financial health beforehand




The Sydney Opera resumed live performances and the city of Melbourne recently hosted the Australian Open tennis tournament with fans (mostly) in attendance.


Continue Reading


50:50 campaign may not get immediate extension

National News Bureau of Thailand





BANGKOK (NNT) – The government’s 50:50 co-pay campaign expiring on 31st March may not be getting an immediate campaign extension. The Minister of Finance says campaign evaluation is needed to improve future campaigns.

The Minister of Finance Arkhom Termpittayapaisith today announced the government may not be able to reach a conclusion on the extension of the 50:50 co-pay campaign in time for the current 31st March campaign end date, as evaluations are needed to better improve the campaign.

Originally introduced last year, the 50:50 campaign is a financial aid campaign for people impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, in which the government subsidizes up to half the price of purchases at participating stores, with a daily cap on the subsidy amount of 150 baht, and a 3,500 baht per person subsidy limit over the entire campaign.

The campaign has already been extended once, with the current end date set for 31st March.

The Finance Minister said that payout campaigns for the general public are still valid in this period, allowing time for the 50:50 campaign to be assessed, and to address reports of fraud at some participating stores.

The Fiscal Police Office Director General and the Ministry of Finance Spokesperson Kulaya Tantitemit, said today that a bigger quota could be offered in Phase 3 of the 50:50 campaign beyond the 15 million people enrolled in the first two phases, while existing participants will need to confirm their identity if they want to participate in Phase 3, without the need to fill out the registration form.

Mrs Kulaya said the campaign will still be funded by emergency loan credit allocated for pandemic compensation, which still has about 200 billion baht available as of today.

Source link

Continue Reading

Most Viewed

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 13,980 other subscribers