Singapore has overtaken Hong Kong as the top financial hub in Asia, according to Z/Yen Group’s Global Financial Centers Index (GFCI).
Hong Kong slipped to fourth place overall, while Singapore now only trails London and New York globally. Although the two financial centers are essentially neck and neck – Singapore scoring 755 points out of 1000 and Hong Kong 752 – the shift is indicative of a wider trend of optimism towards Singapore and uncertainty facing Hong Kong.
Although some reports identify an upsurge in Singapore’s attractiveness as a financial center and a decline in Hong Kong’s, both are leading destinations that are in many ways complementary to each other.
Singapore boasts an agreeable business establishment and operation environment and promotes access to the burgeoning ASEAN region while featuring significant international linkages.
Owing to its relationship with China, Hong Kong presents valuable financial services and substantial business opportunities.
Despite the potential long term loss of special privileges as rival mainland financial centers like Shanghai and Shenzhen become more accessible internationally, Hong Kong remains unparalleled in its ability to reach China.
When entering Asia, consideration of taxation, market access, international linkages, labor costs, industry focus, and other factors must be made to develop an optimal entry strategy suited to particular investor goals and priorities.
The GFCI survey results reflect several indicators of competitiveness, including business environment, financial sector development, infrastructure, quality of labor force, and regulations.
Both Singapore and Hong Kong feature a low tax environment with strong IP protection, contract enforcement, and dispute resolution, and promote fast and accessible business establishment procedures. As both were once British colonies, their legal systems are familiar and effective for Western investors.
While “ease of doing business” is often seen as a euphemism for limited government activity and intervention, in reality effective regulations and government promotions contribute to the countries’ high standings.
Although Singapore and Hong Kong are comparable in many areas, each has their own strengths and weaknesses. As a multilingual state using English as its lingua franca to go along with strong Mandarin, Singapore holds a clear communication advantages over Hong Kong, where the primary language is Cantonese.
According to a study conducted by Dell, Singapore is the world’s third most innovative and future-ready economy due to its ability to facilitate people and organizations to drive change, provide quality infrastructure, and promote innovation, growth, and profitability.
In contrast, Hong Kong ranked 25th in this survey. Similarly, Singapore’s reign on top of the World Bank’s ease of doing business index spanning over a decade is demonstrative of the city state’s inviting environment for forming and operating businesses.
While Singapore leads in many indicators relating to infrastructure, human capital, and business environment, Hong Kong excels in pure financial services and scale.
Hong Kong has 1,883 companies listed on its stock exchange, as opposed to 769 on Singapore’s. In June 2015, there was an average daily turnover of US$18.42 billion in Hong Kong’s securities market, dwarfing Singapore’s, which stood at US$796 million. Similarly, in 2014 Hong Kong’s fund management industry oversaw US$2.3 trillion worth of assets, compared to Singapore’s, which governed US$1.75 trillion worth.
Although Singapore leads in innovation, Hong Kong has a greater capacity to leverage new listings and is particularly strong in equities and IPOs. While Singapore is known for its business-friendly environment, Hong Kong is similarly competitive in this regard, and surpasses its South East Asian rival in some aspects. For example, Singaporean companies must have at least one director who is a resident of Singapore, whereas in Hong Kong there is no such restriction.
Singapore and Hong Kong as Regional Bases
With conditions reinforcing efficient business operations and robust financial services, Singapore and Hong Kong are globally competitive as financial centers on their own merits. However, what makes them particularly unique is their potential to be used as entry points for foreign investors to access neighboring regions, namely due to Singapore’s ASEAN membership and Hong Kong’s status as a Special Administrative Region of China.
Hong Kong has long been used as a platform to access the more restrictive and opaque Chinese mainland, enjoying many unique advantages not found elsewhere. The exclusive relationship allows foreign investors to more easily set up a wholly foreign-owned enterprise (WFOE), access offshore RMB exchange, and cheaply transfer money abroad, among other benefits. Given China’s status as the world’s second largest economy, there are more business opportunities in Hong Kong than in Singapore, and mergers and acquisitions are increasingly China-focused.
Although Hong Kong continues to enjoy preferential policies when dealing with China, there are signals that these advantages will lessen long term.
Mainland China is gradually liberalizing and developing a fully market-based economy, while simultaneously increasing its interference in Hong Kong’s domestic political process. Taken together, Hong Kong appears to be slowly losing its unique status within China.
For example, Hong Kong’s share of South China’s cargo business declined from over 70 percent in 2001 to less than 40 percent in 2015, as ports such as Shenzhen are increasingly liberalizing their policies towards foreign companies and building modern infrastructure. Similarly, movements towards full convertibility of the RMB further reduce Hong Kong’s competitive advantages.
In addition to losing preferential policies, Hong Kong is facing rising instability and encroachments from the Chinese government. In 2014, hundreds of thousands gathered for the months-long “Occupy Central” protests, advocating for greater democratization and independence from Beijing’s meddling. Incidents such as the apparent abduction of anti-government booksellers and a Chinese whitepaper directing Hong Kong judges to be “patriotic” raise concerns over the region’s neutrality.
NGOs such as Freedom House confirm these fears, recording a multi-year trend of declining freedoms and civil liberties, though the region remains far freer than Singapore according to most indicators. However, Singapore arguably offers greater stability and predictability going forward.
As a member of ASEAN, Singapore benefits from preferential policies when investing and conducting business in the territory of the other nine member states.
The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) aims to eliminate tariffs between ASEAN members, harmonize regulatory standards, and promote the formation of a single integrated market.
With rapid growth in several ASEAN countries, affordable labor, improving infrastructure, and a growing consumer class, the long term prospects for the region are promising. As China’s labor costs rise and its growth slows, ASEAN states such as Vietnam are increasingly seen as effective low cost alternatives for foreign investment.
However, the levels of development of ASEAN members vary widely. Less developed members such as Laos and Myanmar offer potential as emerging markets but are plagued by unpredictable governments, and even relatively developed members like Thailand continue to experience significant political volatility. Singapore singularly stands out amongst its ASEAN peers with its exceptional stability and transparent business climate.
The city state also has preferential trading arrangements in place with 61 countries, compared to just six for Hong Kong. Further, the nation has a close relationship with India owing to its considerable population hailing from the subcontinent. Singapore’s stable, international, and low tax environment make it an attractive and increasingly important option for foreign investors looking to explore the tantalizing but sometimes intimidating region of ASEAN.
By Alexander Chipman Koty
Asia Briefing Ltd. is a subsidiary of Dezan Shira & Associates. Dezan Shira is a specialist foreign direct investment practice, providing corporate establishment, business advisory, tax advisory and compliance, accounting, payroll, due diligence and financial review services to multinationals investing in China, Hong Kong, India, Vietnam, Singapore and the rest of ASEAN. For further information, please email [email protected] or visit www.dezshira.com.
Stay up to date with the latest business and investment trends in Asia by subscribing to our complimentary update service featuring news, commentary and regulatory insight.
The ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement
Can border reopening revive tourism in South-East Asia?
In Thailand, where pre-pandemic tourism accounted for 11-12% of GDP, the country lost an estimated $50bn last year as Covid-19 restrictions led to an 82% fall in arrival numbers.
China’s economy stumbles on power crunch
BEIJING (Reuters) – China’s economy hit its slowest pace of growth in a year in the third quarter, hurt by power shortages, supply chain bottlenecks...
Quarantine-Free Thailand Reopens for Vaccinated Tourists From 1 November 2021
The Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) would like to confirm that Thailand is all set to welcome fully vaccinated foreign...
The ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement
The ASEAN-India Trade in Goods Agreement (the “Agreement”) is a trade deal between the ten member states of ASEAN and...
Bangkok lifts more COVID-19 restrictions
In response to the Royal Thai Government’s announcement to relax more COVID-19 controls in the dark-red zone provinces, which include...
Thailand lifts curfew in ‘Blue Zone’ destinations from 31 October 2021
Bangkok, 22 October, 2021 – The Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) would like to provide an update that the night-time...