Had the government of India proposal not run into a buzzsaw of opposition, foreign investors might have given India’s retail industry a jumpstart.
The government tried to limit the potential impact on at least 20 million traders by limiting the big-box stores to cities with more than 1 million people, allowing state governments the right of refusal, mandating that 30 percent of manufactured and processed products come from small domestic suppliers, and requiring foreign investors to invest at least 50 percent in backend infrastructure, explains Nayan Chanda in his regular column for Businessworld.
The plan would have eliminated waste and curtailed India’s distributors who extend low prices to famers and mark up prices for customers in cities.
Foreign investment in retail would not eliminate rural poverty, but modernizing operations can reduce prices and give customers greater choice. The exchange was not one-sided, Chanda notes. India could be missing a chance to unleash a multiplier effect in farmers’ wages, IT, infrastructure and a strengthened supply chain as well as introduce their own skills and products to major foreign retailers. – YaleGlobal
via From Local To Global.
The ASSOCHAM said FDI in multi-brand retail could have created over 10 million jobs in three years.
The decision to hold back FDI in multi-brand retail will have a strong impact on the domestic and foreign investor sentiment, another chamber, the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), said in a release. “We firmly hope that this would not be a rollback and a quick consensus is reached,” CII Director General Chandrajit Banerjee said. Describing the volte face as a case of ‘missed opportunity’, Assocham Secretary General DS Rawat said, “It will send a very negative message to foreign investors.” Rawat said FDI in multi-brand retail could have created over 10 million jobs in three years, curbed wastage of farm products and benefited farmers through better prices for their produce.
Opportunities for Indian Manufacturers in ASEAN
Indian exports largely mirror those of ASEAN states, such as rice, electrical equipment, and clothing and accessories. However, there are still sectors where Indian exporters can potentially exploit market needs – wheat exports, the digital economy, and healthcare.
The economic partnership between India and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) has continued to strengthen since the economic relationship began in 1992 and with the ASEAN-India Free Trade Agreement (AIFTA) coming into effect in 2009.(more…)
India, ASEAN Agree to Review FTA Scope, Address Uneven Market Access
Chief among India’s concerns is that Indian exporters have been denied a level playing field in the Southeast Asian market. Moreover, New Delhi believes that China has taken undue advantage of the ASEAN-India FTA (AIFTA) due to weak rules of origin.
Subscribe via Email
How the COVID-19 situation may affect Thailand’s export sector
Thailand's export sector could face damage of 200-300 billion baht if the situation cannot be brought under control within six...
Thai baht becoming the region’s worst-hit currency in COVID pandemic
According to data from its tourism ministry as well as the World Bank, Thailand had only a little over 34,000...
Asia’s slow rate of vaccination is a thorn in the region’s economic recovery
Southeast Asia has been hit badly. Daily infections for Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam are at their worst, on a seven-day moving...
TAT expects 850 billion baht ($25.7 bln) in tourism revenue after successful reopening
The Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) has set this year’s revenue target at 850 billion baht, 300 billion of which...
Download 1xBet mobile and play all over the world
Placing profitable bets or playing in a casino is now possible comfortably even without being tied to a computer. It...