Had the government of India proposal not run into a buzzsaw of opposition, foreign investors might have given India’s retail industry a jumpstart.
The government tried to limit the potential impact on at least 20 million traders by limiting the big-box stores to cities with more than 1 million people, allowing state governments the right of refusal, mandating that 30 percent of manufactured and processed products come from small domestic suppliers, and requiring foreign investors to invest at least 50 percent in backend infrastructure, explains Nayan Chanda in his regular column for Businessworld.
The plan would have eliminated waste and curtailed India’s distributors who extend low prices to famers and mark up prices for customers in cities.
Foreign investment in retail would not eliminate rural poverty, but modernizing operations can reduce prices and give customers greater choice. The exchange was not one-sided, Chanda notes. India could be missing a chance to unleash a multiplier effect in farmers’ wages, IT, infrastructure and a strengthened supply chain as well as introduce their own skills and products to major foreign retailers. – YaleGlobal
via From Local To Global.
The ASSOCHAM said FDI in multi-brand retail could have created over 10 million jobs in three years.
The decision to hold back FDI in multi-brand retail will have a strong impact on the domestic and foreign investor sentiment, another chamber, the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), said in a release. “We firmly hope that this would not be a rollback and a quick consensus is reached,” CII Director General Chandrajit Banerjee said. Describing the volte face as a case of ‘missed opportunity’, Assocham Secretary General DS Rawat said, “It will send a very negative message to foreign investors.” Rawat said FDI in multi-brand retail could have created over 10 million jobs in three years, curbed wastage of farm products and benefited farmers through better prices for their produce.
India, ASEAN Agree to Review FTA Scope, Address Uneven Market Access
Chief among India’s concerns is that Indian exporters have been denied a level playing field in the Southeast Asian market. Moreover, New Delhi believes that China has taken undue advantage of the ASEAN-India FTA (AIFTA) due to weak rules of origin.
RCEP trade deal hits snag over India’s demand
The 16 Asian and Oceanian countries involved in the regionwide RCEP trade deal have decided to delay the conclusion of that deal until next year.
Thailand woos Southeast Asian tourists with shopping campaign
The programme called “Give Me Five” is set to increase shopping among tourists from Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Vietnam (CLMV) along with Indonesia, Malaysia and India.
Subscribe via Email
Thai fruit exports to FTA markets up 107 percent
China, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines, Hong Kong, Australia and Chile are top importers of Thai fruits, especially fresh durian,...
Digital Revolution and Repression in Myanmar and Thailand
Activists have also proactively published social media content in multiple languages using the hashtags #WhatsHappeningInMyanmar and #WhatsHappeningInThailand to boost coverage...
3 Reasons to Be Optimistic About the Baht Right Now
Probably one of the most important factors for the rise of the Baht is the continued weakness of the US...
Will Thailand’s plan for quarantine-free tourism set a global trend?
According to the Tourism Authority of Thailand, the quarantine-exemption measures implemented in Phuket will be extended to five other key...
Thailand Approves Latest Economic Relief Package for Businesses
Some 250 billion baht (US$8 billion) was allocated for soft loans while the remaining 100 billion baht (US$3.2 billion) will...
Southeast Asia remains a hot spot for plastic pollution
The use of plastics is deeply embedded in our daily lives, in everything from grocery bags and cutlery to water...