# Vietnam’s rise and Thailand’s inequality problem

- Link: https://www.thailand-business-news.com/news/283639-vietnams-rise-and-thailands-inequality-problem
- Published: 2026-02-05T12:21:03+07:00
- Author: Nguyen Trang

The article “Richer, Faster—But for Whom? Vietnam’s rise and Thailand’s inequality
problem” examines the divergent economic development paths of Vietnam and Thailand,
focusing on the concept of “Pro-Poor Growth” from an institutional economics perspective.
It highlights a noticeable shift in Thai public sentiment, from urgency to resignation
or even encouragement, regarding **Vietnam’s economic progress and its potential
to surpass Thailand.**

The core argument is that institutions—rules, norms, and governance structures—are
crucial in determining who benefits from economic growth, and Gross Domestic Product(
GDP) alone is insufficient to measure improvements in quality of life for all segments
of society. Pro-Poor Growth is defined as economic growth that disproportionately
benefits the poor or significantly reduces poverty.

ADVERTISEMENT

## Vietnam’s Experience: Growth with Redistribution

Vietnam’s success in sustained poverty reduction post-1986 Doi Moi reforms, which
transitioned it from a centrally planned to a market-oriented economy, is attributed
to its “Growth with Redistribution” strategy. Key factors include:

 * **Land Reform and Human Capital:** Dismantling collective farming and restoring
   land-use rights to households, alongside significant investment in human capital
   through the “Education for All” program to prepare unskilled labor for foreign
   direct investment (FDI).
 * **Structural Economic Shift:** A systematic move from agriculture to manufacturing
   and services, with a strong emphasis on generating employment for unskilled labor
   and gradual skill upgrading.
 * **Spatial Development:** Heavy investment in infrastructure, such as achieving
   99.9% rural electricity coverage by 2018, and fiscal/administrative decentralization
   to empower local governments. This approach resulted in average growth rates 
   of 5–7% over decades and continuous poverty reduction, despite global crises,
   increasing per capita income eighteenfold. However, Vietnam still faces the risk
   of the middle-income trap, leading to the launch of Doi Moi 2.0 aimed at achieving
   high-income status by 2045.

## Thailand’s Path: Growth without Redistribution

In contrast, Thailand, despite rapid economic expansion in the 1980s, followed a
trickle-down economics model, believing wealth would eventually benefit the broader
population. This approach has led to low growth and high inequality, explained by
several institutional weaknesses:

 * **Disconnected Policies:** Economic growth policies are often formulated separately
   from poverty reduction and redistribution measures, leaving structural problems
   unaddressed.
 * **Middle-Income State Characteristics:** Reliance on foreign labor and capital,
   coupled with limited coordination for domestic technological and innovation development,
   indicating a lack of institutional upgrading.
 * **Concentrated State-Business Relations:** Particularly after 2014, close cooperation
   with large conglomerates created a “big brother–small brother” dynamic, concentrating
   resources and disadvantaging smaller enterprises.
 * **Policy Inconsistency:** Frequent government changes undermine policy continuity,
   resulting in short-term poverty relief measures (e.g., cash transfers) driven
   by immediate political demands rather than fundamental structural reforms.

## Rethinking Development: Lessons and Recommendations

While Thailand should not merely emulate Vietnam, its experience offers crucial 
lessons. Escaping the middle-income trap and addressing inequality requires integrating
redistribution into the growth strategy from the outset. The article’s central policy
argument is that inclusive development must place those at the bottom of the socioeconomic
pyramid at the core of economic policymaking, simultaneously pursuing economic expansion
and income redistribution. Examples include designing digital economy and infrastructure
investments to provide targeted social protection for the poor and using decentralization
to spread prosperity and create local employment.

### Related**Posts**

###  󠀁[SCB EIC forecasts robust economic growth in Asia for 2026 fueled by global electronics cycle and AI](https://www.thailand-business-news.com/news/333031-scb-eic-forecasts-robust-economic-growth-in-asia-for-2026-fueled-by-global-electronics-cycle-and-ai)󠁿

###  󠀁[Asian stocks retreat as oil rises above $100 and investors reassess global rate risks](https://www.thailand-business-news.com/markets/333019-asian-stocks-retreat-as-oil-rises-above-100-and-investors-reassess-global-rate-risks)󠁿

###  󠀁[Thailand Business News — Morning Briefing](https://www.thailand-business-news.com/news/332535-thailand-business-news-morning-briefing-3)󠁿

###  󠀁[Thailand Business News — Morning Briefing](https://www.thailand-business-news.com/business/332413-thailand-business-news-morning-briefing-2)󠁿

Vietnam’s success is attributed to policy continuity and institutional design that
explicitly integrates the poor into its growth strategy, learning from China and
East Asian “miracle” economies that demonstrated sustainable, equitable growth is
possible in market economies with outward orientation, macroeconomic stability, 
and human capital investment. Thailand, therefore, needs to rethink its economic
policy design—shifting from treating growth and poverty reduction as separate objectives
to creating institutional rules that ensure the benefits of development are broadly
and sustainably shared, especially with the poor, while upholding democratic principles.

Source : [Richer, Faster—But for Whom? Vietnam’s rise and Thailand’s inequality problem](https://www.nationthailand.com/the-opinion/commentary/40062107)