Thailand announced its departure from the World Heritage Convention with‬ ‪immediate effect on Saturday, after the World Heritage Committee failed to heed its request seeking postponement of the Cambodia’s unilaterally-proposed Preah‬ Vihear Temple management plan, as Thailand fears that it may threaten national sovereignty.

Thailand’s Natural Resources and Environment Minister Suwit Khunkitti, leading the Thai‬ delegation at the 35th session of the WHC meeting in Paris, earlier notified Mr Mounir‬ Bouchenaki, director-general of International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and‬ ‪Restoration of Cultural Property, who represents the director-general of United Nations‬ ‪Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation UNESCO, that Thailand would leave the World‬ Heritage Convention and would also withdraw from the 21-member World Heritage Committee as the‬ body continues to ignore any negative consequences which may arise from the consideration of the temple management plan which he said overlooks sensitive issues which could adversely affect Thailand’s sovereignty and territory.‬

However, the withdrawal was not fully backed by the Foreign Ministry, a government source said.

Officials from the Foreign Ministry who attended the meeting together with Suwit in Paris were satisfied with their negotiations with the Cambodian delegation on the draft of the World Heritage Committee’s decision.

Cambodia Thailand temple
The Thai business opportunities in Cambodia in the long-term inevitably will be harmed if the border conflict persists.

Suwit, who led the Thai delegation to the World Heritage Committee meeting in Paris last week, reported to the Cabinet on his decision to walk out of the session and the announcement of denunciation. The action is to protect Thai sovereignty over the territory adjacent to the Preah Vihear Temple, Panitan quoted Suwit as telling the Cabinet.

Abhisit backed Suwit’s decision and most of ministers in the Cabinet agreed with him, but the caretaker government decided not to carry out the procedure of denunciation, Panitan said.

‪Mr Suwit also said the World Heritage Centre, instead of revising the wording of the draft, decided to put it on the agenda of the WHC meeting in Paris, despite Thailands request to have the plan deferred, pending border demarcation with Cambodia. ‬‪Thailand is opposed to the terms of “urgent repair and restoration” but preferred using the wording “protection and conservation” in the draft.‬ ‪The head of the Thai delegation also said the pullout means that any WHC resolution will not be binding to Thailand.‬‪

The withdrawal has resulted in the Director General of the Fine Arts Department, Mrs Somsuda Leyavanija, one of 21 members of the WHC, to leave her post.‬‪ Mr Suwit earlier posted a message on his Twitter account late Saturday night saying, “Thailand has no choice but to withdraw as the meeting has resolved to put the issue on agenda.”‬

via Thailand pulls out of World Heritage Convention ‬.

Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva on Tuesday said the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Director-General Irina Bokova has sent a letter expressing her regret over Thailand’s decision to withdraw from the World Heritage Convention.

bokova unesco
Director-General Irina Bokova has sent a letter expressing her regret over Thailand's decision to withdraw from the World Heritage Convention.

Mr Abhisit, before the weekly cabinet meeting, showed reporters a letter from the UNESCO chief and said briefly that he would address a news conference on Thailand’s stance after today’s Cabinet meeting.

National Resources and Environment Minister Suwit Khunkitti, as head of the Thai delegation to the World Heritage Committee meeting in Paris, will report the issue to the Cabinet and agencies concerned will study the implication of the UNESCO agency’s resolution on Cambodia’s management plan for Preah Vihear after Thailand leaves the convention.

In her letter dated June 26, Ms Bokova has expressed deep regret with Mr Suwit’s declaration on the Thai intention to leave the 1972 World Heritage Convention.

“The World Heritage Committee did not discuss the management plan of the Preah Vihear temple nor did it request for any reports to be submitted on its state of conservation. Moreover, it needs to be clarified that UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre never pushed for a discussion of the Management Plan by the Committee,” Ms Bokova said in the letter.

Speaking after a cabinet meeting yesterday, Mr Suwit denied he would benefit from the decision to withdraw from the convention.

He said the decision was not premature and was intended to protect the country’s dignity and territorial integrity.

During the past three years he had done everything he could to lobby and convince member nations that the management plan was a sensitive issue and that approving the plan could lead to problems.

He said a resolution relating to Preah Vihear adopted at the Paris meeting of the World Heritage Committee had allowed Cambodia to carry out maintenance and repair work for Preah Vihear and the areas surrounding it and to seek financial assistance from Unesco.

Mr Suwit said he found the resolution unacceptable because it could lead to the loss of Thai territory.

If Thailand had accepted the resolution, it would have given Cambodia a chance to use it to fight at the International Court of Justice for ownership of the disputed areas around the temple.

About the author

  1. the speculation about the Cambodian troops build up or reenforce at the border Cambodia- Thailand, it does not make any sense since Cambodia will get nothing gain from this non sense. they’ve got the whole international communities backing them. more importantly, they have got the truth. it doesn’t matter how hard you try to lobby, the international communities are not stupid. they will make the decision base on evidences. don’t you dare to walk out from the world stage like that,you just made a fool of yourself. do you have any idea the world looking at you right now? low… low.. just remember, society has rules. oh, about the coup thing, it’s kind of out off date these days in 21 st century. hope not to see again. have a nice and fair ELECTION!

  2. World court judged 50 years ago that only Preah Vihear Temple, but not territory around there, is belong to Cambodia. However, Cambodia tries to claim territory near the temple too ( including a few temple near Preah Vihear ). This is a unacceptable point for Thailand. If Preah Vihear management plan does not include Thailand’s territory , Thailand will not disagree with the plan.

    1. All these temples were built by the Cambodian people, and they belong to them. Thailand is holding “Cambodia” hostage because of its internal problems and ultra-nationalism. The Democrat Party led by Abhisit Vejjajiva has been using Preah Vihear as an issue to win votes from the PAD and other nationalist fanatics. Don’t let Abhisit fools you Thai people! Vote him and his gang out of politics. Thailand and its neighbors will be able to live without fear.

  3. Actually, the caretaker government don’t feel afraid to lose what so called diputed area even a hair thread that they know the land belongs to Cambodia but lose power in the coming election instead that’s why they’re trying to play a flat ball as to gain popularity from Thai people.

  4. Jarrod, Jack, and larry you guys are spot on. Thailand doesn’t have anything to lose trying to claim what’s not theirs. It has the military might and economic power. Sadly, this is enough to win support from some who careless about history or what’s right as long as it benefits them. The U.S. has condemned any country for rights abuse but their allies. They turned a blind eye. Hey even the UN body doesn’t have much to say except to call for restrain.

  5. I have to say this is all making a poor show for Thailand. Walking out of the convention in a huff coupled with the nationalistic frenzy it is showing the rest of the world, its prime opposition leader a fugitive (as is, however, Cambodia’s), and its military trumpeting–Thailand is losing the international support it has been trying to leverage here. Oddly, it is trying to leverage international support for bilateral negotiations rather than international or ASEAN level cooperation.

  6. Thailand is being very immature on this matter. It doesn’t have a case and it’s taking every avenue to create a case for itself to claim a land that is not theirs, and no one believes Thai case; now Thailand is taking its ball home — a great loss to Thailand. If you can’t play well with others, don’t step into the playground.

  7. Well Thai has nothing to lose. Thai is trying to claim cambodia’s sovereignty and territory. Thai has military and ecomony power. They want to take advantage and they have success in the past 35 years. As i said, let franch be the judge, this matters.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get notified of our weekly selection of news