Populism and anti-globalisation is gripping much of the West. The United States and the United Kingdom, for example, are conflicted in different ways over trade and globalisation.
President Trump’s ‘America first’ agenda has created much uncertainty about US leadership of the global economy and its commitment to the multilateral free trade system.
And there seems to be no end in sight, as the Democrats are locking themselves into positions similar to those of Trump on trade and China as they battle it out for the left in the US primaries for the presidential election in 2020. The new British Prime Minister Boris Johnson is racing Brexit towards a no-deal divorce from the European Union in October.
The upheavals in the United States and the United Kingdom offer an important lesson for economic policymakers. Opening economies up to international commerce, ideas and migration has lifted billions out of poverty and brought prosperity to much of the world. But that success is conditional on getting domestic policies right.
The harsh lessons from the rise of populism
The harsh lessons from the rise of populism are clear: those countries that managed to distribute the gains of globalisation across society, maintain full employment and ensure a high level of social security are not suffering the same backlash that’s evident in the United States.
The first line of defence for countries, therefore, is to get their own houses in order.
But what else do other countries need to do in the face of a United States that is actively applying WTO-illegal tariffs on imports from other countries and threatening to render the enforcement of global trade rules in the WTO ineffective?
Brexit is a blow to the global economic system as well, but the United Kingdom is a much smaller part of the global economy, and doing its best to make itself even smaller.
What’s needed most is collective action, to defend the multilateral system.
There was an early sign of this in Trump’s presidency when Japan led the conclusion of the Trans-Pacific Partnership without the United States. But since then the going has been tougher.
The news is not all bad
As Peter Drysdale and Mari Pangestu explain in our lead feature this week, ‘the past ten days have seen two developments in global trade diplomacy that seem to offer important ways to deal with the US leadership deficit and, hopefully, over the long term, to attract the United States back into more productive global economic engagement’.
The first is an initiative by the European Union (EU) and Canada. As Drysdale and Pangestu explain, the EU and Canada have agreed to a ‘workaround of the US blockage on appointing judges to the WTO appellate body. Their solution is to create a shadow appellate body to rule on future disputes between the EU and Canada, using retired appellate judges’. Importantly, ‘Brussels and Ottawa have effectively issued an open invitation to other governments to participate’.
This is the bottom-up solution that the WTO has been waiting for. Instead of waiting until December when the US veto of judges to the appellate body causes the whole dispute settlement system to become ineffective, countries can replicate and improve on the existing system.
The WTO rules may be out of date and the dispute settlement system has its own problems but the organisation still enforces multilateral trade rules for its 164 members. China, the world’s largest trader, has more at stake in those rules than most.
The other development is the just-concluded meeting of trade ministers from East Asian countries in Beijing to try to finalize the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreement by the end of this year.
It’s only the second ministerial meeting for the RCEP group to be held outside an ASEAN country, after Japan hosted the ministers last year.
With China, India, Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand negotiating around the ASEAN hub, the agreement accounts for almost 40 per cent of global trade and 45 per cent of the world’s population. The scale alone means that RCEP will be an agreement that locks in reforms and opening of strategic importance globally and gives multilateralism a boost.
The ministers appear to realise the urgency in concluding the agreement that has eluded them for too long. Developments elsewhere in North America and Europe are affecting the growth outlook everywhere. East Asia needs this agreement to make progress between countries in a region where bilateral difficulties and tensions persist.
Bilateral agreements between many in the RCEP grouping are too politically difficult to conclude but agreement multilaterally comes a little easier. Exhibit A is Japan and South Korea that are descending into a lose-lose…
Author: Editorial Board, ANU
How Trade Made the Richest 0.1% Even Richer
Among the alleged ills of globalisation, few have dominated the headlines in the past decade as much as worsening inequality.
Covid Lockdowns are Overly Blunt and Costly
New evidence suggests lockdowns were an overly blunt and economically costly tool. They are politically difficult to keep in place for long enough to stamp out the virus.
In response to the novel and deadly coronavirus, many governments deployed draconian tactics never used in modern times: severe and broad restrictions on daily activity that helped send the world into its deepest peacetime slump since the Great Depression.(more…)
Creating Long Term Growth in Thailand Post- Covid-19
Key mechanisms to position Thailand as the premier destination for investment include regulatory predictability and transparency as well as competitive tax policies and regulations
As governments and companies navigate through the new normal and ongoing transformations, The American Chamber of Commerce in Thailand (AMCHAM Thailand) offers long-term measures to support long term, sustainable economic growth in Thailand.(more…)
Raising inequality posing credit risks for sovereign in APAC countries
Governments with weaker social protection systems and tighter fiscal positions will face tougher challenges in tackling income inequality
Salary increases in Thailand and Singapore expected to be among the world’s highest in 2021
Few countries are expected to see a significant rise in the level of real salary increases in 2021, but there...
Bank of Thailand steps in to curb recent baht strength
Bank of Thailand accelerates measures to advance the development of the new Thai FX Ecosystem and to limit excessive currency...
Standard and Poor’s maintain Thailand’s credit rating at BBB+
The agency is confident in Thailand’s finances, in spite of measures needed to respond to COVID-19, resulting in a deficit...
Will RCEP help drive South-east Asia’s Covid-19 recovery?
The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was finally signed on Sunday November 15, on the sidelines of the annual summit...
Bank of Thailand keeps policy rate at 0.50 percent
The Committee voted unanimously to maintain the policy rate at 0.50 percent to support economic recovery while placing emphasis on...
Subscribe via Email
Economics7 days ago
EXIM Bank forecasts Thai exports growth as high as 4 per cent in 2021
Banking1 week ago
Thailand borrows US$ 1.5 billion from ADB to fight Covid-19
Banking7 days ago
Thai banks remain resilient in Q3 2020 but profits declined
Banking6 days ago
Bank of Thailand keeps policy rate at 0.50 percent