Connect with us

Opinion

Why Asia needs to rethink the ‘sharing economy’

What is popularly called the ‘sharing economy’ has done a lot of good and reached tremendous heights in Asia. GoJek and Grab added US$6.6 billion to Indonesian GDP in 2018.

Avatar

Published

on

Once celebrated as exemplars of the ‘sharing economy’, China’s bike-sharing companies rapidly filled Chinese cities with bikes.

But millions of abandoned bicycles now litter and clog public spaces. In the Philippines, enterprising Filipinos are buying new cars for ‘ride-sharing’.

Car dealers even cite ride-sharing as the reason behind increasing car sales, which may conceivably worsen Manila’s traffic congestion. In Japan, international investors are buying properties to rent on Airbnb, even though many Japanese neighbourhoods have decried the intrusion of home-sharing guests into their residential areas.

GoJek and Grab added US$6.6 billion to Indonesian GDP in 2018

What is popularly called the ‘sharing economy’ has done a lot of good and reached tremendous heights in Asia. GoJek and Grab added US$6.6 billion to Indonesian GDP in 2018.

The size of China’s sharing economy was estimated to have reached US$438 billion in 2018. Sharing economy companies, also known as platform companies, have unlocked new sources of income for many informal workers, the underemployed and marginalised. Users have found it easier to access superior services ranging from transport to delivery and temporary accommodation.

In What Is Mine is Yours, Rachel Botsman and Roo Rogers show that in a sharing economy, underutilised capacity is shared through technology platforms.

This relieves the burden of buying and maintaining new assets. Other conceptions emphasise that access to assets rather than ownership is key.

Evoking the imagery of collaboration and sharing, the ‘sharing economy’ has garnered a moral force that companies like to associate themselves with.

But when an asset is acquired purposefully for profit-oriented activities, is it still ‘sharing access’ or simply ‘selling access’? When bikes were added to China’s bike-sharing networks, they were purchased as assets precisely to be rented repeatedly.

This is a bike rental network, not a sharing system.

A car bought for profit may be used occasionally in car-pooling services and this may seem like sharing. But that capacity would not exist if it was not bought for ride apps in the first place. Airbnb properties in Japan are bought by investors who do not even live in Japan.

In these instances, ‘underused capacity’ is not magically utilised. Instead, new capacity is added to the system. Despite this, the sharing economy is widely used in business environments because it makes it easy for companies to portray themselves as sharing platforms and therefore virtuous.

When seen as part of the sharing economy, some firms gain access to government incentives schemes and private investment.

When the Chinese government designated the sharing economy as a national priority in 2015, many so-called bike-sharing companies enjoyed tax breaks and an influx of investment. This created oversupply and waste disposal problems.

By signalling that exchange occurs in the spirit of sharing rather than traditional profit transaction, technology companies can occupy a legal grey zone. There may indeed be no enabling clauses in pre-existing regulation for sharing transactions or any prohibitive clauses against access or asset sharing. Companies have grounds then to operate unfettered by regulatory constraints.

By leveraging their credentials as collaborative technological entities, platform companies can angle for different treatment. For example, Manila’s amended ride-hailing directive does not require ‘ride-sharing’ cars in Manila to follow the rules of their taxi counterparts.

These include mandatory inspections and the maintenance of expensive workshop-garages. The platforms are also allowed to set prices more freely. Due to these differences in treatment, conflicts have raged between platform and traditional workers.

Virtuous labels may also obscure undesirable social consequences arising from the success of platforms. Unrestricted home-sharing may price out residents and create unwanted intrusions. New cars bought solely for platform work could conceivably add to severe pollution and traffic congestion in gridlocked Southeast Asian cities.

Competition from platforms has reduced the income of vulnerable conventional players. For example, at least 10 per cent of commuters in Hanoi, Jakarta, Singapore and Kuala Lumpur have shifted to ride apps, representing a sizeable income loss for incumbent taxi drivers. Even if conventional players are being pushed out by platforms offering better value for users, the plight of so many disenfranchised incumbents could be a social problem deserving a government response.

Author: Godofredo Ramizo Jr, Oxford

The sharing economy brings sizeable economic benefits but governments must loosen regulation only in the presence of adequate safeguards and amendment…

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Comments

Asean

We’ve entered the Asian Century and there is no turning back

In the nineteenth century, the world was Europeanized. In the twentieth century, it was Americanized. Now, it is being Asianized – and much faster than you may think.

Avatar

Published

on

Asia’s rise has been swift. Home to more than half of the world’s population, the region has climbed from low- to middle-income status within a single generation. By 2040, it is likely to generate more than 50% of world GDP, and could account for nearly 40% of global consumption.

(more…)

Continue Reading

Opinion

Sufficiency Economy, King Bhumibol Adulyadej’s most enduring legacy

In a sufficient economy, generation of material wealth should rely more on environmentally healthy, self-sufficient communities in which basic human needs are met through Iocal natural production methods.

Olivier Languepin

Published

on

Decades before Sustainable Development became the buzzword of UN agencies, Thailand had already experienced it with the Sufficiency Economics theory, perhaps the most everlasting legacy of King Bhumibol Adulyadej.

(more…)

Continue Reading

Opinion

The hidden dangers of Asia’s cashless society

For the past decade, Asia has been pioneering the movement towards cashless economic ecosystems by investing billions of dollars into mobile payments technology, with the hope of driving innovation and stimulating more activity in the region’s economy.

Avatar

Published

on

The appeal of mobile e-wallets is evident in Asia and the past decade, Asia has had bold ambitions to make the cashless society a reality. 

(more…)

Continue Reading

Most Read

Upcoming Events

Wed 27

The Future Energy Show Thailand

November 27 @ 10:00 am - November 28 @ 5:30 pm BMT
Dec 02

Top Food science conference 2019

December 2 @ 9:00 am - December 3 @ 5:00 pm BMT
Dec 05
Dec 05

The Healthcare+ Expo Taiwan

December 5 @ 9:00 am - December 8 @ 5:30 pm BMT

Press Release

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 11,822 other subscribers

Trending