Connect with us

Tech

FIFA Soccer will make you love and hate your PS Vita (review)

EA Sports didn’t just drop a year number from the PlayStation Vita version of FIFA Soccer, a title that’s hugely important for the franchise’s success in portable form. While the developer made some omissions to simplify the intricacies of the console version, this is undoubtedly the most complete handheld iteration ever — not that the bar is set very high in this area. For me, the previously released FIFA 12 didn’t only cement the series’ fanny to the soccer throne, it provided a marquee moment for virtual sports. The introduction of the Tactical Defending System, Precision Dribbling, and Player Impact System revolutionized the genre so thoroughly that it rendered Konami’s Pro Evolution Soccer efforts completely pointless. FIFA 12 was the result of sustained hard work and invention from EA’s dedicated team, a sacrifice that can be felt throughout each match. Luckily, the franchise’s galvanization in quality hasn’t dampened the effectiveness of FIFA Soccer on Vita. The aforementioned “Holy Trinity” doesn’t make an appearance, but this never becomes a substantial problem. Dual-analog sticks allow for a slick game, as passes ping around the pitch with vigor. Your team constantly strives to find space, providing you with the means of unlocking even the most hardened defense. The default camera view is excellent when analyzing what ball you need to play next, providing peripheral vision that’s vital to success. The Vita scales proceedings down considerably but manages to replicate a sense of composure and pace that series aficionados will feel instantly comfortable with. Successful FIFA players have always had to adapt their game from one iteration to the next, and this title is no different. While elements such as defending and dribbling aren’t as archaic as they were in FIFA 11, they lack the precision of the latest console release. Perfect timing isn’t needed to tackle, and the game won’t punish you too often for sticking a leg in at the wrong time. Stoppages are harder to come by, as retrieving the ball lacks any real risk. While your team shies away from instantly homing in on the player in possession (like they did in FIFA 11), you’ll never have to plan your defensive strategy to the extent of FIFA 12. The onus is placed on dealing with each situation as it arises, without any emphasis on pre-determined tactics or structure. Basic formations are needed to execute each gameplan, but you won’t be shoring up free space and jockeying the opposition to win every single ball. The lack of defensive efficiency is a backward step, but it allows the Vita to show its strengths in other areas. Controls convert across well, with only a handful of slight alterations to learn. Due to the lack of trigger buttons, players now perform chip shots by clinking both the L+R buttons down together, an example that pinpoints how EA has overcome the limitations of the hardware. Although simple for the most part, dribbling runs into a few noticeable problems. Flicking the right stick in a certain direction still puts space between your player and the ball (a key skill for evading opposition in the console game), but it lacks accuracy and precision. I found it easier to pass around the defense rather than heading into a one-on-one conflict. Utilizing Vita’s touchscreen and rear touchpad, FIFA Soccer’s most interesting inclusion is the arrival of an entirely original control scheme. Like in EA’s iPhone titles, you can pass the ball to any player by tapping his position. Fundamentally, this should work, but the Vita’s stocky size isn’t as conducive for this as Apple’s handheld, a system where such control is necessary. Instead, you’ll find yourself losing grip of the Vita and the match in front of you, rendering the inclusion as nothing more than a failed experiment. The use of the rear touchpad is far more interesting. EA has cleverly doubled it up as a template for the goal you’re trying to penetrate, an application that sounds better than it works. If you want to plant a thunderbolt in the top corner, the idea is to poke Vita’s back in the corresponding place. Power is strengthened by holding your finger down for an extended amount of time, but as intriguing as this is, it never outshines the classic method of control. Having the rear touchpad active during a match can also throw up persistent frustration, as you accidentally punt the ball away with the slightest of touches. This restricts how you hold the handheld even more, and I doubt many players will continue to use it after the novelty has worn off. It certainly represents a step in the right direction and an early indication as to what Vita could do with the series, but right now it isn’t fleshed out enough to be considered essential. FIFA 12′s career mode is very much intact here, allowing you to cut it as a player, manager, or combination of both. It couldn’t be more pleasing to see EA has taken its content seriously, moving across all of the console game’s single-player modes. Transfer markets thrive throughout each career, rumors swirl, and your team has to be managed with a dedicated amount of care. Be-A-Pro also makes a welcome return, giving you the opportunity to build your very own rags-to-riches story. Your created player’s statistics can improve during any of the game’s single-player modes, from the 15-year career to the training arena that masks each loading screen. Everything is so instantly accessible and familiar that the only major differences show themselves on the pitch. For all its single-player prowess, FIFA Soccer is lacking in a couple of multiplayer areas. Ultimate Team is the most noticeable absentee, somewhat surprising when you consider the massive push it’s received over the past year. Vita is perfect for such a mode, as the option to buy cards, improve squads, and build your fantasy club seems to go hand-in-hand with the device’s portability. If EA really had its minds in gear, Ultimate Team would have been included with PlayStation 3 connectivity. I want to be able to improve my team on the fly, return home, and challenge the world on my big screen. Right now this is an outlandish dream, much like my desire for England to bring home the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Visually, this title does a decent job. Each player is suitably detailed and recognizable, and I urge you to use the instant replay’s zoom function to admire EA’s handiwork. From Carlos Tevez’s scars to David Beckham’s chiseled good looks, FIFA Soccer doesn’t fair much worse than its console cousin, in a static state at least. Once the action gets moving, each match flows solidly, especially for a first crack on Sony’s handheld. Replays don’t fair so well, highlighting choppy animation that isn’t spotted when the game is running at full speed. Definitely room for improvement but there aren’t too many complaints to be had at this point in time. Conclusion With a plethora of familiar modes and polished gameplay, FIFA Soccer is a comforting portable companion for fans of the sport. It sits between the slickness of FIFA 11 and grit of FIFA 12, forging a simple experience that acts as a welcoming introduction to Vita’s capabilities. As ever, EA has produced a thoroughly enjoyable and time-consuming addition to a series that continues to grow in popularity. Drawbacks aside, this is an accomplished and worthwhile addition to any soccer fan’s collection. Score: 75/100 FIFA Soccer was released for the PlayStation Vita on February 15, 2012. A copy of the game was provided by the publisher for the purpose of the review. Filed under: games

Avatar

Published

on

EA Sports didn’t just drop a year number from the PlayStation Vita version of FIFA Soccer, a title that’s hugely important for the franchise’s success in portable form. While the developer made some omissions to simplify the intricacies of the console version, this is undoubtedly the most complete handheld iteration ever — not that the bar is set very high in this area. For me, the previously released FIFA 12 didn’t only cement the series’ fanny to the soccer throne, it provided a marquee moment for virtual sports. The introduction of the Tactical Defending System, Precision Dribbling, and Player Impact System revolutionized the genre so thoroughly that it rendered Konami’s Pro Evolution Soccer efforts completely pointless. FIFA 12 was the result of sustained hard work and invention from EA’s dedicated team, a sacrifice that can be felt throughout each match. Luckily, the franchise’s galvanization in quality hasn’t dampened the effectiveness of FIFA Soccer on Vita. The aforementioned “Holy Trinity” doesn’t make an appearance, but this never becomes a substantial problem. Dual-analog sticks allow for a slick game, as passes ping around the pitch with vigor. Your team constantly strives to find space, providing you with the means of unlocking even the most hardened defense. The default camera view is excellent when analyzing what ball you need to play next, providing peripheral vision that’s vital to success. The Vita scales proceedings down considerably but manages to replicate a sense of composure and pace that series aficionados will feel instantly comfortable with. Successful FIFA players have always had to adapt their game from one iteration to the next, and this title is no different. While elements such as defending and dribbling aren’t as archaic as they were in FIFA 11, they lack the precision of the latest console release. Perfect timing isn’t needed to tackle, and the game won’t punish you too often for sticking a leg in at the wrong time. Stoppages are harder to come by, as retrieving the ball lacks any real risk. While your team shies away from instantly homing in on the player in possession (like they did in FIFA 11), you’ll never have to plan your defensive strategy to the extent of FIFA 12. The onus is placed on dealing with each situation as it arises, without any emphasis on pre-determined tactics or structure. Basic formations are needed to execute each gameplan, but you won’t be shoring up free space and jockeying the opposition to win every single ball. The lack of defensive efficiency is a backward step, but it allows the Vita to show its strengths in other areas. Controls convert across well, with only a handful of slight alterations to learn. Due to the lack of trigger buttons, players now perform chip shots by clinking both the L+R buttons down together, an example that pinpoints how EA has overcome the limitations of the hardware. Although simple for the most part, dribbling runs into a few noticeable problems. Flicking the right stick in a certain direction still puts space between your player and the ball (a key skill for evading opposition in the console game), but it lacks accuracy and precision. I found it easier to pass around the defense rather than heading into a one-on-one conflict. Utilizing Vita’s touchscreen and rear touchpad, FIFA Soccer’s most interesting inclusion is the arrival of an entirely original control scheme. Like in EA’s iPhone titles, you can pass the ball to any player by tapping his position. Fundamentally, this should work, but the Vita’s stocky size isn’t as conducive for this as Apple’s handheld, a system where such control is necessary. Instead, you’ll find yourself losing grip of the Vita and the match in front of you, rendering the inclusion as nothing more than a failed experiment. The use of the rear touchpad is far more interesting. EA has cleverly doubled it up as a template for the goal you’re trying to penetrate, an application that sounds better than it works. If you want to plant a thunderbolt in the top corner, the idea is to poke Vita’s back in the corresponding place. Power is strengthened by holding your finger down for an extended amount of time, but as intriguing as this is, it never outshines the classic method of control. Having the rear touchpad active during a match can also throw up persistent frustration, as you accidentally punt the ball away with the slightest of touches. This restricts how you hold the handheld even more, and I doubt many players will continue to use it after the novelty has worn off. It certainly represents a step in the right direction and an early indication as to what Vita could do with the series, but right now it isn’t fleshed out enough to be considered essential. FIFA 12′s career mode is very much intact here, allowing you to cut it as a player, manager, or combination of both. It couldn’t be more pleasing to see EA has taken its content seriously, moving across all of the console game’s single-player modes. Transfer markets thrive throughout each career, rumors swirl, and your team has to be managed with a dedicated amount of care. Be-A-Pro also makes a welcome return, giving you the opportunity to build your very own rags-to-riches story. Your created player’s statistics can improve during any of the game’s single-player modes, from the 15-year career to the training arena that masks each loading screen. Everything is so instantly accessible and familiar that the only major differences show themselves on the pitch. For all its single-player prowess, FIFA Soccer is lacking in a couple of multiplayer areas. Ultimate Team is the most noticeable absentee, somewhat surprising when you consider the massive push it’s received over the past year. Vita is perfect for such a mode, as the option to buy cards, improve squads, and build your fantasy club seems to go hand-in-hand with the device’s portability. If EA really had its minds in gear, Ultimate Team would have been included with PlayStation 3 connectivity. I want to be able to improve my team on the fly, return home, and challenge the world on my big screen. Right now this is an outlandish dream, much like my desire for England to bring home the 2014 FIFA World Cup. Visually, this title does a decent job. Each player is suitably detailed and recognizable, and I urge you to use the instant replay’s zoom function to admire EA’s handiwork. From Carlos Tevez’s scars to David Beckham’s chiseled good looks, FIFA Soccer doesn’t fair much worse than its console cousin, in a static state at least. Once the action gets moving, each match flows solidly, especially for a first crack on Sony’s handheld. Replays don’t fair so well, highlighting choppy animation that isn’t spotted when the game is running at full speed. Definitely room for improvement but there aren’t too many complaints to be had at this point in time. Conclusion With a plethora of familiar modes and polished gameplay, FIFA Soccer is a comforting portable companion for fans of the sport. It sits between the slickness of FIFA 11 and grit of FIFA 12, forging a simple experience that acts as a welcoming introduction to Vita’s capabilities. As ever, EA has produced a thoroughly enjoyable and time-consuming addition to a series that continues to grow in popularity. Drawbacks aside, this is an accomplished and worthwhile addition to any soccer fan’s collection. Score: 75/100 FIFA Soccer was released for the PlayStation Vita on February 15, 2012. A copy of the game was provided by the publisher for the purpose of the review. Filed under: games

Loading...

Source: 

FIFA Soccer will make you love and hate your PS Vita (review)

Comments

Ecommerce

How will oil prices shape the Covid-19 recovery in emerging markets?

Oxford Business Group

Published

on

How will oil prices shape the Covid-19 recovery in emerging markets?

– After falling significantly in 2020, oil prices have returned to pre-pandemic levels
– The rise has been driven by OPEC+ production cuts and an improving economic climate
– Higher prices are likely to support a rebound in oil-producing emerging markets
– Further virus outbreaks or increased production would pose challenges to price stability

Loading...

A combination of continued production cuts and an increase in economic activity has prompted oil prices to return to pre-pandemic levels – a factor that will be crucial to the recovery of major oil-producing countries in the Middle East and Africa.

Brent crude prices rose above $60 a barrel in early February, the first time they had exceeded pre-Covid-19 values. They have since continued to rise, going above $66 a barrel on February 24.

The ongoing increase in oil prices, which have soared by 75% since November and around 26% since the beginning of the year, marks a dramatic change from last year.

Following the closure of many national borders and the implementation of travel-related restrictions to stop the spread of the virus, demand for oil slumped globally.

In the wake of the Saudi-Russia price war in early 2020, Brent crude prices fell from around $60 a barrel in February that year to two-decade lows of $20 a barrel in late April, as supply increased and demand plummeted. The value of WTI crude – the main benchmark for oil in the US – fell to record lows of around $40 a barrel last year on the back of a lack of storage space.

While global demand for oil remains low, one factor credited with reversing the trend is the decision to make significant cuts to oil production, which subsequently tightened global supplies.

Read More

Continue Reading

Tech

How the Rural-Urban Divide Plays Out on Digital Platforms

It is one thing for entrepreneurs, whether urban or rural, to create and operate an online store, as some digital platforms have made it relatively easy to manage an e-store – even by using just a smartphone.

Avatar

Published

on

In the West, villages are emptying out due to the lack of economic opportunities. Consider Italy where, in a bid to attract newcomers, a handful of municipalities have turned to selling houses for €1.

Loading...
(more…)

Continue Reading

Ecommerce

Will South-east Asia’s tech giants turn to SPACs to boost post-pandemic growth?

Oxford Business Group

Published

on

Will South-east Asia’s tech giants turn to SPACs to boost post-pandemic growth?
– SPACs have become a hot-button topic in global finance
– The vehicle is widely used to help tech start-ups go public
– Both Singapore’s and Indonesia’s exchanges are set to allow SPACs
– Several South-east Asian tech unicorns may use SPACs to list publicly

Loading...

South-east Asia is seeing a wave of interest in special purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs, with various major tech players considering them as a means to fast-track public listings. In parallel to this, several exchanges in the region are moving to allow SPAC listings, with a view to boosting post-coronavirus growth.

SPACs are shell companies set up by investors and then listed on a given stock exchange. Their sole function is to acquire a private company, enabling it to go public without having to go through a traditional initial public offering (IPO).

A SPAC does nothing beyond its essential function – it neither produces nor sells anything, and a SPAC’s only assets are the funds raised from its own IPO.

Crucially, people who buy into a SPAC do not know what its eventual acquisition target or targets will be. This is why SPACs are often referred to as “blank cheque companies”: they give the founders a free rein to back their choice of private company. A key feature of SPACs is that they are often headed by big-name business executives or fund managers, who trade on past successes to inspire trust in investors.

While they are far from a novel phenomenon, SPACs have become a hot button topic in recent times: SPAC initial offerings quadrupled last year, with the vehicles raising a record $80bn.

Merging with a SPAC enables a company to go public and raise capital more quickly and painlessly than with a traditional IPO, circumventing some of the volatility that Covid-19 unleashed on global markets. At the same time, they function rather like venture capital, helping investors to buy into high-growth start-ups on the ground floor.

Read More

Continue Reading

Most Viewed

Subscribe via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 13,958 other subscribers

Latest

Trending