# Is Roulette a Game of Skill or Luck?

- Link: https://www.thailand-business-news.com/thailand-prnews/is-roulette-a-game-of-skill-or-luck
- Published: 2025-08-07T18:29:50+07:00
- Author: PR Desk

One of the oldest debates that people have been having surrounding roulette is whether
it is a game of skill or not? In other words, if you play roulette long enough, 
can you eventually get better at it? The question has plagued casino goers for a
long time.

Decades after the game’s invention, the rise of [Novibet online roulette](https://www.novibet.ie/casino/roulette)
has reignited the debate. However, there are many who believe that the answer is
clear as day. Still, in this article, we would like to explore the question, and
come to a conclusion once and for all.

**Skill and Roulette**

The agreement that most have come to is that skill has no place in roulette. The
game relies entirely on the whim of the little steel ball that the croupier tosses
onto the spinning red and black wheel. That being said, there are many who are convinced
that skill will help them win the day. Those who believe this often bring up the
examples of famous roulette players from history.

The most popular example people bring up is Charles Wells, a man who famously “broke
the casino at Monte Carlo.” Mr. Wells won 23 out of 30 roulette spins, and took 
home millions. To this day, people argue whether Wells got lucky, or if there was
something more to it. Did he know something about the game that the rest of us are
unaware of?

A more recent example that plenty of proponents for the skill argument bring up 
is Niko Tosa. What many thought to be [an unassuming Croatian gentleman](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2023-04-06/meet-niko-tosa-the-man-who-proved-roulette-was-beatable)
ended up going down in history as a gambling savant. He’d been visiting the Ritz
quite frequently, astounding the croupiers with his winning streaks. One of the 
casino’s managers called him the luckiest player he’d ever seen. 

**Luck and Roulette**

On the other hand, is the argument that focuses on luck. The truth of the matter
is, both Charles Wells and Niko Tosa did not use skill to win the games. Perhaps
it is true that they got lucky. Or, it could be that they noticed a flaw in the 
design of the roulette tables that would make it likelier for the ball to land on
a specific number. Such flaws do not exist online, and therefore are not a measure
of roulette skill.

The game is based entirely on luck. There is no way to predict with any degree of
accuracy where the little steel ball is going to land, once it has been tossed. 
Does that mean that the game is unbeatable? No, of course not. There are examples
from all throughout history of men and women winning at roulette. However, it does
mean that there is no way to guarantee victory in the game.

Some claim that mathematics is a good way to predict the outcome. However, that 
is simply untrue. Even one of history’s smartest mathematicians, Albert Einstein,
could not crack the code. The Nobel-winning scientist famously joked that the only
sure way to beat roulette is to steal the money while the croupier is distracted.