On 23 January 2017, President Donald Trump took an executive action to formally withdraw the US (Aaa stable) from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade pact.

Since the US held effective veto power over the agreement due to the size of its economy, its decision means the deal cannot go ahead in its current form.

This represents a lost opportunity for Asia Pacific signatories, and especially for those countries that would have substantially expanded their export access to major markets.

The TPP deal went far beyond existing free trade agreements (FTAs), by setting standards in areas including intellectual property rights, government procurement, environmental and labor conditions, and corruption prevention, in addition to reducing or eliminating tariffs.

It also further increased access to trade – even where agreements already existed – by addressing some sensitive markets, such as Japan’s agricultural products.

TPP signatory economies – Australia (Aaa stable), Brunei (unrated), Canada (Aaa stable), Chile (Aa3 stable), Japan (A1 stable), Malaysia (A3 stable), Mexico (A3 negative), New Zealand (Aaa stable), Peru (A3 stable), Singapore (Aaa stable), the US and Vietnam (B1 stable) – accounted for about 40% of global GDP.

Lost export and growth opportunities are material for Vietnam, Malaysia

Both would have benefited from the opening up of trade with the US, and relatively large foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows longer term.

For Japan and New Zealand, TPP would have lowered tariffs on important exports. For Singapore, it would have smoothed production chain linkages, and services would have gained greater market access.

TPP-fuelled reform momentum could lose steam

TPP acted as a catalyst for reform in several signatory countries. While implemented measures are unlikely to unravel, TPP’s demise could slow the impetus for structural change that could boost competitiveness and investment, and improve institutional quality.

In particular, TPP ratification in Malaysia would have necessitated reforms to state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and government procurement. It is now unclear whether such reforms will proceed.

New trade deals unlikely to fully substitute for TPP

Signatory countries are working on other bilateral and multilateral trade deals, including the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP).

However, with the exception of a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific agreement (FTAAP), the potential benefits from these trade pacts would be smaller than TPP, as they would cover a smaller share of global trade, overlap with existing arrangements, and be narrower in scope.

Subscribers can access the full report at:


About the author

1 comment
  1. In fact is that the new North American administration has already shown lack respect for international legal norms President Trump can not do what he would like

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get notified of our weekly selection of news

You May Also Like

TAT and Thai Vietjet Air sign letter of intent to promote tourism to Thailand

Thai Vietjet Air will operate the largest flight capacity between Vietnam and Thailand when it doubles the frequency of its flights between Ho Chi Minh City and Bangkok – planned to happen this month – to up to six flights per week.

New Tax Measures Impacting Businesses and Individuals in Singapore’s Budget 2022

The moves come as Singapore emerges from an economic slump as the government has committed over S$100 billion (US$74 billion) over the last two years to cushion the economy from the impact of the pandemic.

iPads’ production heads to Vietnam

The move, planned last year but delayed by Vietnam’s own COVID surge, highlights the importance of Vietnam for Apple in its ongoing quest for supply chain stability